Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 2e1312 No.9749096 Jun 26 2020 02:21:59 (EST)
Important people understand for future events.
Assumption or intel based?
All assets [F][D] deployed.
[D] + China = 11.3
Not sure if “[D] + China = 11.3” means China will flood polls on 3 Nov with fake [cloned] ballots to help Biden (or whoever Dem candidate is) or if “11.3” = marker re: announcement of Podesta’s arrest (related to coord with China) ref’d in early drops.
Quoting Potus comment. Confirms Q proof that China is going to print millions of ballots on same paper using same machines fo try to defraud is.
D = Democrat + China = 11.3. November 3 day of election.
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 2e1312 No.9749513 Jun 26 2020 02:53:42 (EST)
POTUS mentions in CA they’ve sent out over 30M ballots. “Where are they going?” CA’s pop = 39.9M and 14.2M people voted in 2016 (incl fraud). Easy to see where this is headed. He also said we need “ID voting”. Assuming we have intel re: China’s role.
Q linking to Potus interview with Hannity where he mentions China duplicating ballots.
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 6ad4b3 No.9750210 Jun 26 2020 03:54:46 (EST)
Daily attacks are normal.
But, what are the odds this particular hit re: FB censorship push comes the next day? [think battlefield and mission(s)]
No coincidence Daily BEAST posted that long-a**, boring hit piece right after Q posted our marching orders & told us not to retreat from the battlefield (Twitter, FB, etc). Seems to be a HUGE push for us to move to Parler. THE WAR IS HERE.
Looks like Ms. Wong locked down her account after Q linked to her thread (in drop 4526) which had a link to her excruciatingly boring & ridiculously dishonest hit piece in the Daily BEAST.
Day after Q tells anons not to retreat from social media battlefield and tells us our mission objectives Verizon announces they are removing ads from FB because their adds were running next to Qanon content. Putting pressure on FB to Ban Qanon content.
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 6ad4b3 No.9750369 Jun 26 2020 04:07:20 (EST)
Anonymous ID: 42c812 No.9750276 Jun 26 2020 04:00:33 (EST)
Wow!!! Another 0 delta.
Dan is to blame.
So many hints @DanScavino is on Q team. This appears to confirm! POTUS often mentions “millions” of followers on 5 sites & says “Isn’t that right, Dan?” Posting Q drop & POTUS tweet at exact same time down to sec hard. “Device lag or feeder site delay”.
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 6ad4b3 No.9750472 Jun 26 2020 04:13:12 (EST)
Wow! I can’t believe I got Q’d. This is so surreal. Q it’s an honor. I’m excited to serve my country in any capacity anytime any day twice on Sunday. America is the best country in the world. I love all my fellow countrymen and anons worldwide. Thank you! #WWG1WGA #QAnon #QArmy pic.twitter.com/RdQXrNZgZ5— OracleExec 🇺🇸 (@OracleExec) June 25, 2020
The honor is ours.
Nice meeting you.
Guessing @DanScavino & POTUS met @OracleExec on 4 Oct ’19 at the WH at the Young Black Leadership Summit. I’m sooo envious!! Congratulations for another Q shout-out!
Q tells anon who was Q’ed it was nice meeting him. He is at the WH in this picture. Was Q present when he was at WH? Perhaps.
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 0b2f6b No.9757400 Jun 26 2020 20:02:11 (UTC)
"These governors are withholding information from the public and House Dems are letting them get away with it with their partisan refusal to join our investigation." - @SteveScalise— House Republicans (@HouseGOP) June 26, 2020
Republicans are demanding answers from Dem Governors about their disastrous nursing home orders: pic.twitter.com/JVHVE2NM5n
Did order(s) violate government mandated policies?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were reckless?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were negligent?
“The immunity of a state from suit has long been held not to extend to actions against state officials for damages arising out of willful and negligent disregard of state laws.165 The reach of the rule is evident in Scheuer v. Rhodes,166 in which the Court held that plaintiffs were not barred by the Eleventh Amendment or other immunity doctrines from suing the governor and other officials of a state alleging that they deprived plaintiffs of federal rights under color of state law and seeking damages, when it was clear that plaintiffs were seeking to impose individual and personal liability on the officials. There was no “executive immunity” from suit, the Court held; rather, the immunity of state officials is qualified and varies according to the scope of discretion and responsibilities of the particular office and the circumstances existing at the time the challenged action was taken.”
“Would a jury of peers agree their actions were reckless? Would a jury of peers agree their actions were negligent?”
Depends on whether or not jury is made up of Dems.
No executive immunity for these murderers.
These Govs will be held accountable criminality and civilly. Sovereign Immunity doesn’t extend to recklessness or gross negligence.
Have faith in Humanity. We are in this together. WWG1WGA!!! Q
UPDATED 22 UTC — Perhaps some understood the significance of the music posted yesterday. How many of our brothers and sisters play this song prior to the drop (LZ)? It’s going to be a very hot summer. Add to your playlist. Q
UPDATED 8 UTC — Why would [D]s block a bill that stops infanticide [allow abortions up to point of birth] and does not provide new restrictions on abortion itself? How is taxpayer funded [PP] allowed to donate [large sums] of taxpayer funds to select members of [D] party? Is this about a woman’s right to choose OR SOMETHING ELSE?
Clicks on the Ads Keep Us Alive 🙂
- 2020 Server Cost Support - 3200 € 80% 80%
Support Disclosure News Italia
We are working hard, and every day, to keep this blog. Like you we are fighting for the truth. If you want to work with us you are welcome, please email us! The blog costs are at our expense, advertising reimburse us very marginally so if you like our work and find it useful buy usacoffee clicking the donation button below that will directu to your PayPal. We need the help of people like you!
Bitcoin & Cryptocurrencies Donation